So what makes this card so special? Some of the university's more studious students claim it's the access to library books and on-line archives. Other students would agree it's admittance to the CampusRec Center and pool. But local restaurants agree it's the magic black magnetic strip on the back.
Named the CatCard, it allows access to campus facilities, student services, ATM's, but most importantly n food.
|
|
But are parents and students really getting options worthy of the money they pour into this bottomless plastic pit?
Many of the students and restaurants lining Tucson's University Boulevard say no.
For the past seven years, the Domino's Pizza at 1033 N. Park Ave., has accepted the CatCard's meal plan as a form of payment for delivery orders to residence halls and nearby homes. As many students see it n that's free pizza, although parents might disagree.
Sounds like a win-win deal for students and Domino's. This is exactly why so many want in on the CatCard meal plan action.
So why aren't they getting in on the action?
Dana Hall, manager of Penguin's Frozen Yogurt, 825 E. University Blvd., claims the university has made it extremely difficult and complicated for local businesses to have CatCard meal plan access.
"It's all about money. Not about giving kids choices," Hall said. "It's not about the big picture with them (UA)."
Hall says she naively called three years ago to find out about how to obtain CatCard meal plan access for her shop and was, "shut down in so many words."
Andrew Adey, who owns Pita Pit, 845 E. University Blvd., has similar views.
"It's a write-off. They'll never allow it," he says. "The student union would fold. They're babysitting them."
Both Penguin's and Pita Pit would like to be able to accept the CatCard meal plan.
Other restaurant owners believe it will never happen and there is no use in trying.
"It doesn't really make sense for a small business like us to pay high per transaction fees," says Matt Jones, manager of No Anchovies, 870 E. University Blvd. "Maybe Domino's gets breaks since they are such a big corporation."
David Galbraith, director of the UA's food service, insists there are no breaks given to anyone.
He explained that Domino's won the UA's proposal that was offered to every pizza company in Pima County. Domino's won the very specific proposal that specifies the location providing the delivery service must be on-campus.
According to the State of Arizona's academic policy all students are exempt from paying sales tax on food served on university property.
"We could do it (allow CatCard Meal plan access to University Boulevard restaurants), but there would be no sales tax exemptions and the students would end up paying the higher price," Galbraith said.
Penguin's Hall responds, "They obviously just don't want the kids to go off campus in order to keep their revenues."
Galbraith claims the UA actually does not substantially profit from the food at the student union.
"We get the highest volume of food we can for the lowest price," he said. "After paying for the food, the labor, utilities, equipment, mortgage, and other student union related fees there's nothing left."
Galbraith describes the cost of equipping a restaurant on or off-campus with the CatCard equipment as gigantic. The machine to swipe the CatCard costs roughly $2,000. Then there is a $750 annual maintenance fee, a six percent transaction fee, and because the machine is not automated, there is the added cost to pay an employee to account for each swipe.
"Six cents of every dollar," Pita Pit's Adey says. "It's kind of a rip-off."
Rip-off or not, restaurants are resigned to the fact they aren't likely to be part of the CatCard's meal plan anytime soon.
And what about the students?
As he sipped his extra large Coke in line at the Student Union's Panda Express, UA freshman Dan Mitchell said "I really like the Student Union food, but after a couple of weeks you get bored of it. Me and my friends go to University (Boulevard) at least three times a week for dinner. It gets expensive."
Like many students, Mitchell's parents do not give him money for food besides what is put into his CatCard's meal plan.
At the core of the CatCard controversy is the student's perception of its value. It's up to the students to decide if they will fork out an extra couple bucks of their highly prized cash to eat off-campus. While the UA and the local commercial businesses argue over their share of the financial pie, students such as Mitchell will continue to sense reduced value in the CatCard.
Teri L. Schramm is a freelance writer and former student at the University of Arizona. Comments regarding this article may be e-mailed to editor@azbiz. com or call (520) 294-1200.









Comments
sailmold wrote on Oct 30, 2009 2:45 AM:
ugg boots "
neighborhood watch wrote on Dec 18, 2008 4:03 PM:
...He forgot to mention that he is BLOCKING the view of everyone who lives directly to the south and west of this development. There are about 50 homes that used to have views which are now obstructed by giant yellow machines. I have watched this developed destroy the desert, tear precious saguaros from the ground and cause the surrounding neighbors pain. These are working class people who have worked hard to make their houses into homes. Their peace and sanity has been torn from them due to this project. They say they will increase the value of the surrounding areas, I think not. Who is going to want to buy a house surrounded by a bunch of ugly townhomes that blocks their view of any of the nearby desert! I hope these town homes don't sell. The neighborhood directly to the north is full of low income families, and several meth labs have been raided in the area. I don't know any doctors and lawyers like over-looking meth labs, but last time I checked not very many. My hope is that this project will put developers like this in to bankruptcy when their homes don't sell. Then they can get a taste of their own community-destroying medicine. Saying that they are trying to improve this community is a joke. From someone who lives around here, we all hate you and your stupid development!!!! Boycott Spreiser Realty! They are just in it for the money and they have a complete lack of respect for the community. Go check out the construction site today if you don't believe me- they have let it fill up with trash which is now blowing around the neighborhood. Usually when you run a business it is not a good idea to upset everyone off in your community-- but Spreiser has sure succeeded at that! "
Kaye wrote on Apr 2, 2008 3:38 AM:
:-) "
T. J. Shain wrote on Jan 19, 2008 11:01 AM:
shaintj@aol.com "
ann wrote on Oct 20, 2007 12:36 PM: