That’s the forecast of retail specialist Pete Villaescusa, first vice president CB Richard Ellis Tucson. He, along with office specialist David Volk, industrial specialist Bill DeVito, operations manager Don Ahee, and CEO Tim Prouty, offered CBRE’s mid-year analysis and forecast.
Retail, industrial and office vacancies are all under 10 percent, said Prouty. “That’s the first time in my experience I’ve seen that.”
|
|
Industrial outlook
Ending a quarter-century of oversupply following the divestiture of the late Howard Hughes’ real estate holdings around Tucson, a combination of factors has turned the tide in Tucson, slashing the vacancy rate for industrial space to only 7.78 percent, the lowest level in five years.
Large formerly vacant buildings have now been leased by the likes of Pella Windows, Macsteel Service Centers and Glass Fiber Inc., DiVito said and improved industrial land has dwindled to record lows.
“Historically, we’ve had an abundance of industrial land. In the early to mid 1980s, we had about 30 years’ supply of improved industrial lots,” DiVito said. Now, “there’s no land,” because much of it is being gobbled up by residential home builders buying large tracts for subdivisions, including in areas once thought to be destined for industrial uses, such
as near Tucson International Airport.
Lease rates have been driven upward by the lack of industrial buildings. Where the cost per square foot used to be $2, “we’re now averaging $3.50 per square foot, and, in some more desirable places, it’s $7 per foot,” he said. “It’s amazing how quickly the situation changed.”
Looking to the future, DiVito said its possible Tucson could lose out on relocations.
“They may want to come here, but locate in Apache Junction or Albuquerque because they can’t find a 100,000-square-foot space,” he said.
Office outlook
Rather than relocations, “organic growth” of local companies is what’s causing the supply of available office space to dry up.
“It used to be that every time we got the point where someone might think about building, somebody else would move out of a large space,” Prouty said. “It’s different now.”
Growth of local companies is swallowing available space and pushing net absorption rates to 130,000 square feet, or nearly twice the 68,000 square feet of space under construction.
“Right now, there’s a slew of office users in Tucson in 10,000 to 20,000-square-foot spaces and they’re squeezed,” Volk said.
With a vacancy rate of only 8.96 percent, far below the nearly 14 percent recorded during the fourth quarter of 2003, lease rates are also headed higher, averaging $21.37 per square foot.
Now it’s a “landlord’s market,” Volk said, even large office vacancies don’t stay on the market.
“Misys is vacating 180,000 square feet and AOL has 50,000. Right now, my understanding is the at 60 percent of the Misys space is already pre-leased. By the time they actually vacate, the expectation is that all of the space they’re leaving will already be leased,” he said. “There are many companies, local companies, that are bursting at the seams and ready to make the shift to larger space,” but there isn’t enough space for lease. The beneficiary of this will be owners of older buildings, who offer an alternative to paying the high construction costs for office condominiums and free-standing buildings. “These Class C and Class D buildings are seeing the benefit of improvements because people prefer them.”
Retail outlook
When it comes to retail space, the vacancy rates rebounded from an eight-year low to 8.7 percent, but the present isn’t the future, said Ahee. In Sahuarita, he said, the relocation of Wal-Mart to a new super center building created a major vacancy, but continued construction of shopping center and a free-standing big box space to meet demand by national retailers should push the vacancy rate back down. Even the lower disposable income of new home buyers in suburban areas won’t hold the retail expansion back.
“In the 1980s, there was more disposable income in the South Tucson area than the area around Ina and Thornydale, because of high mortgage payments,” Ahee said. “It’s amazing how fast that changed.”
Because retail is the highest-yield option for commercial construction, developers build when the right number of “rooftops” are completed, he said. Then they wait for income to catch up.
It’s the same story for the retailers, themselves, Villaescusa said. While there may be a shakeout as some retailers decide they’ve overbuilt, there will be others to take their place. “Meanwhile, retail construction will continue to follow residential construction to the northwest, southwest and southeast,” he said. “Everything is tracking pretty much as expected.”
E-mail comments for publication to editor@azbiz.com. Contact Philip S. Moore by e-mail at pmoore@azbiz.com or call (520) 295-4238.
© 2006 Inside Tucson Business. All Rights Reserved








Comments
sailmold wrote on Oct 30, 2009 2:45 AM:
ugg boots "
neighborhood watch wrote on Dec 18, 2008 4:03 PM:
...He forgot to mention that he is BLOCKING the view of everyone who lives directly to the south and west of this development. There are about 50 homes that used to have views which are now obstructed by giant yellow machines. I have watched this developed destroy the desert, tear precious saguaros from the ground and cause the surrounding neighbors pain. These are working class people who have worked hard to make their houses into homes. Their peace and sanity has been torn from them due to this project. They say they will increase the value of the surrounding areas, I think not. Who is going to want to buy a house surrounded by a bunch of ugly townhomes that blocks their view of any of the nearby desert! I hope these town homes don't sell. The neighborhood directly to the north is full of low income families, and several meth labs have been raided in the area. I don't know any doctors and lawyers like over-looking meth labs, but last time I checked not very many. My hope is that this project will put developers like this in to bankruptcy when their homes don't sell. Then they can get a taste of their own community-destroying medicine. Saying that they are trying to improve this community is a joke. From someone who lives around here, we all hate you and your stupid development!!!! Boycott Spreiser Realty! They are just in it for the money and they have a complete lack of respect for the community. Go check out the construction site today if you don't believe me- they have let it fill up with trash which is now blowing around the neighborhood. Usually when you run a business it is not a good idea to upset everyone off in your community-- but Spreiser has sure succeeded at that! "
Kaye wrote on Apr 2, 2008 3:38 AM:
:-) "
T. J. Shain wrote on Jan 19, 2008 11:01 AM:
shaintj@aol.com "
ann wrote on Oct 20, 2007 12:36 PM: