In my case—and for most of us under 30 years old—a record is something of a foreign object. The first time I saw one, I was about 10 years old. I was digging through the piles of junk my parents had gathered for a garage sale. The album was Neil Young’s “Harvest,” released in 1972. I held the large cardboard book in my hands and studied it, pulled out the black disc inside, felt the grooves and thought to myself it would make a pretty decent Frisbee. I asked my mom what the object was and she replied, “That’s a record, it’s like a cassette tape…they don’t really use them anymore.”
“Harvest” is now a favorite LP in my small collection.
|
|
Kaufman agrees that a number of those who buy vinyl do so for the collector’s aspect of it - how else could you justify spending $600 on a Calypso album that PDQ currently has displayed on its wall? - but most still purchase vinyl for the music itself and the sound quality.
Kaufman owns many records himself but doesn’t refer to himself as a collector.
“I buy it for the music,” he says.
He owns plenty of compact discs too, but enjoys listening to most of his music in vinyl format.
“It’s something I’ve kind of regressed back to,” Kaufman says. “When I was young, my uncle used to tell me that CD’s didn’t have the same ‘brightness’ to them and I didn’t understand what he meant. Now I do.”
Vinyl is also not just your parent’s music format either. Kaufman claims PDQ’s customer base is as varied as its music selection.
“We have this kid, under 10, who comes in here and likes to buy Skid Row records,” he says.
If you are interested in rediscovering some of the music you used to listen to, the way it was intended, PDQ is the place to go. Aisles upon aisles and crates upon crates of LP’s, EP’s, 45’s, 78’s, even some good 8-tracks are crammed into the modest
warehouse-esque store.
PDQ only sells used copies - though plenty are still sealed in their plastic shrink wrap, deemed too precious or too awful to open by their original owners - and most can be purchased for around $5.
Of course, customers aren’t limited to recordings from the past if you are interested in vinyl. Contrary to some popular belief, a lot of new music releases are also pressed, in limited quantities, on vinyl.
According to Kaufman, the biggest lull in vinyl production was in the early 90’s, when compact discs began catching on. He says there seems to be a resurgence of vinyl pressing in the past several years.
Part of that may be due to the large number of independent record labels popping up that have more freedom to distribute music how they want rather than simply following the industry norm.
Saddle Creek is an independent label based in Omaha, Neb. The majority of the releases on the label are simultaneously released on vinyl. Though Jason Kulbel, a Saddle-Creek label manager, estimates that vinyl accounts for less than five percent of sales for a given release, he insists on the importance of keeping the format alive.
“It’s important for us as lovers of the format and part of the vinyl buying community. Some people view it as a collector’s niche but I don’t really see it as a novelty at all,” he says.
Saddle Creek is also keeping up with technology and realizes the direction music distribution is headed. With many of their releases on vinyl, they include a link to a free one-time digital download of the album in Mp3 format so that customers can still enjoy their music in a variety of formats.
“Digital gets a little more prominent all the time,” states Kulbel. “I am sure there will be a day where the vast majority of music is bought digitally, but we are a ways off from that right now.”
Finding current releases on vinyl can be difficult depending on where you live. Here in Tucson, Zia Record Exchange is one of the few places to look. A few weeks ago, I went in search of the new Bob Dylan record, Modern Times. A Zia employee informed me that their last copy - one of only two they ordered - was on hold for another employee. She called up the other store location and I was fortunate to get one of their two reserved copies.
I’m not one to spend hundreds of dollars on some obscure Beatles EP, and I’m not particularly an audiophile. I listen to vinyl because I believe many albums are meant to be enjoyed as complete works of art rather than a series of butchered pieces uploaded to an Mp3 player. I also don’t like the idea of spending 99 cents per track, the going rate for a legally downloaded song online. For equal or lesser cost per album, I can have a something tangible, with liner notes and album art. And as I drop the needle on Modern Times, I can’t help but think that’s the way Bob Dylan intended it.
E-mail comments for publication to editor@azbiz.com. Robert Ford is a Tucson-based freelance writer.







Comments
Gail Wilson wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:16 AM:
My name is Gail Wilson.
Would you please help me with my son's case? I am sending this to you for "Exposure" if nothing else, please.
The email below was sent 3 days before this Public Defender Robin Lipetkzy "Changed things".
Subject: Re: Jay Shawn Johnson To: "GAIL WILSON" From: "Robin Lipetzky" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:22:16 -0700 Hi Gail- I spoke with the DA again yesterday. I explained that the most that Jay would be willing to do is an additional two to three years. He said they cannot agree to that. So, at this point we will be planning for another trial. The first step is deciding on the right attorney to handle the case within our office. I will be meeting with Jay this morning to discuss the next steps with him. I am extremely disappointed that the DA will not agree to something more reasonable for Jay. I am also determined that we will fight his case in trial with every resource that we have. I'll see you this afternoon. Robin -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone was PLAYING or GOT PLAYED Regarding JAY SHAWN JOHNSON –CASE NO 960691-4 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V JAY SHAWN JOHNSON DEAR ROBIN LIPETZKY, DAVID COLEMAN, RON BOYER, WILLIAM GAGEN,STEPHEN BEDRICK Something very wrong happened on April 25, 2008. I believe ROBIN was playing both sides (Public Defender working for the DA) or ROBIN got played by the District Attorney (according to the DA's quote in the Newspaper). I BELIEVE ROBIN LIPETZKY WAS NOT TRUTHFUL WITH JAY AND INSTEAD OF COUNSELING, ROBIN USED HER POWER OF INFLUENCE, INGRAINED FEAR TO PERSUADE JAY TO ACCEPT THE PLEA. Mr. Gagen and Ron Boyer and let's not forget about Stephen Bedrick (who took this case to the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURTS and WON) all the work that you put into this case. For what, so the ROBIN LIPETZKY and her RELIABLE SOURCE can SPIT ON YOUR EFFORTS. When I spoke with Robin on Friday the 18th of April, I ask if she did not believe in Jay, PLEASE refer the case. I believe Robin has assigned herself as JUDGE AND JURY in respect to Jay's case. THIS IS WRONG. YOU MUST CORRECT THIS NOW. I could not remember everything that I would like to say about Jay and this situation. Jay is a wonderful person. As a child he was my right hand "man" even though he was only five years old. I truly don't know what I would have done without him. His three younger brothers were attached to him and vice versa. "