Real estate set to get easier to buy in Sonora

By Philip S. Moore, Inside Tucson Business
Published on Friday, January 05, 2007

Taking a major step forward in easing the process of buying and financing real estate in Mexico, the governors of Sonora and Baja California Norte will meet in February to announce their support for a series of land exchange and title reforms, being developed in cooperation with the government of Mexico by the National Law Center for Inter-American Free Trade in Tucson.

The governors of the two Mexican states will join with Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano at Puerto Peñasco n or Rocky Point n to pledge their support for the final Securitization Project report. They are expected to announce their plan to be the first in Mexico to follow the steps outlined in the blueprint, designed to open the doors to U.S. investors and lenders.

Sponsored by the U.S. Trade Development Agency, the reform plan will standardize the Mexican real estate market, allowing mortgages, south of the border, to be bundled and traded like U.S. mortgages, opening the way to the leading American capital markets.



Advertisement
Not only clearing the way for American buyers to more easily purchase property, the new rules will allow Mexicans to acquire conventional home mortgages for residential developments, especially housing for the nation’s growing population of potential low and middle income home buyers.

Once implement, “the rules will make the real estate purchasing process transparent,” said Boris Kozolchyk, National Law Center director. Providing recommendations for legal and registry reform and modernization, as well as standardization of real estate transaction information, he said, “Buyers and lenders will have easy access to titles and any liens on the property.”

Starting with Sonora, and extending to the rest of the country over the next several years, Mexican home buyers and real estate brokers will also be able to find a complete set of standardized transaction forms in one place, at the law center or through the Internet. This, alone, will transform real estate sales, making it into something far simpler and more predictable than the current complex process.

The process of developing the Securitization Project report and implementation blueprint “has been a lot more positive than we, ourselves, thought it would be,” Kozolchyk said. “We thought we’d find more legal and political problems than we’ve encountered.”

He said, “At this point, we can say With IMI Group, a Phoenix-based international mortgage bank, and other lenders already entering the Mexican real estate market, he said this is something Sonora and Baja Norte want to do, as quickly as possible. With the report and the accompanying blueprint, “They’ll be able to do it.”

Beyond Mexico, Kozolchyk said the law center is drafting trade and real estate legislation for members of the Central American Free Trade Agreement. Sponsored by the Inter-American Development Bank, the Tucson staff is working with a government-wide task force of Guatemalan officials to develop a law for secured transactions that will reform foreign sales and purchasing rules, as well as bankruptcy and e-commerce laws. They will also be consulting with the governments of Guatemala and Honduras on revised procedures for appraisal, financial statement and recording property titles.

With CAFTA, the nations of Central America “have to opportunity to open their countries to investment,” Kozolchyk said, “and for countries, such as Guatemala and Costa Rica, things are going forward at a good pace.”

He said, “We’re helping the CAFTA members to tap into bank credit. The ability to lend and a quick way to recover, in the same way as with a domestic lien under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, is the only they’ll be able to access the credit they need, and that’s the only way these countries will be able to benefit from the export opportunities offered by the trade agreement.”

E-mail comments for publication to editor@azbiz.com. Contact Philip S. Moore by e-mail at pmoore@azbiz.com or call (520) 295-4238.

© 2006 Inside Tucson Business. All Rights Reserved

PREVIOUS: Technology firm CDEX relocates HQ to TucsonNEXT: Five-diamond chef partners with Gavi on new venue

Comments

Gail Wilson wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:16 AM:

" Hello
My name is Gail Wilson.
Would you please help me with my son's case? I am sending this to you for "Exposure" if nothing else, please.
The email below was sent 3 days before this Public Defender Robin Lipetkzy "Changed things".

Subject: Re: Jay Shawn Johnson To: "GAIL WILSON" From: "Robin Lipetzky" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:22:16 -0700 Hi Gail- I spoke with the DA again yesterday. I explained that the most that Jay would be willing to do is an additional two to three years. He said they cannot agree to that. So, at this point we will be planning for another trial. The first step is deciding on the right attorney to handle the case within our office. I will be meeting with Jay this morning to discuss the next steps with him. I am extremely disappointed that the DA will not agree to something more reasonable for Jay. I am also determined that we will fight his case in trial with every resource that we have. I'll see you this afternoon. Robin -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone was PLAYING or GOT PLAYED Regarding JAY SHAWN JOHNSON –CASE NO 960691-4 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V JAY SHAWN JOHNSON DEAR ROBIN LIPETZKY, DAVID COLEMAN, RON BOYER, WILLIAM GAGEN,STEPHEN BEDRICK Something very wrong happened on April 25, 2008. I believe ROBIN was playing both sides (Public Defender working for the DA) or ROBIN got played by the District Attorney (according to the DA's quote in the Newspaper). I BELIEVE ROBIN LIPETZKY WAS NOT TRUTHFUL WITH JAY AND INSTEAD OF COUNSELING, ROBIN USED HER POWER OF INFLUENCE, INGRAINED FEAR TO PERSUADE JAY TO ACCEPT THE PLEA. Mr. Gagen and Ron Boyer and let's not forget about Stephen Bedrick (who took this case to the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURTS and WON) all the work that you put into this case. For what, so the ROBIN LIPETZKY and her RELIABLE SOURCE can SPIT ON YOUR EFFORTS. When I spoke with Robin on Friday the 18th of April, I ask if she did not believe in Jay, PLEASE refer the case. I believe Robin has assigned herself as JUDGE AND JURY in respect to Jay's case. THIS IS WRONG. YOU MUST CORRECT THIS NOW. I could not remember everything that I would like to say about Jay and this situation. Jay is a wonderful person. As a child he was my right hand "man" even though he was only five years old. I truly don't know what I would have done without him. His three younger brothers were attached to him and vice versa. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 500 words or fewer.

Comments appear immediately on the site. Editors do review comments periodically during the day, and will remove offensive or off-topic content. You may also report inappropriate comments to the editors. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

What is Twitter?



RSS RSS Feed