The fresh fish myth: fish farming in the desert

By Ashli Woods
Inside Tucson Business
Published on Friday, May 09, 2008



Kevin Fitzsimmons’ passion for aquaculture is evident, right down to the blue fish swimming on his tan collared dress shirt.

The University of Arizona professor has devoted his career to correcting what he believes is a stigma placed on fish farms based on misconceptions that have been amplified by environmental groups.


ADVERTISEMENT

"We can no more feed the world by hunting and gathering fish out of the ocean than we can by hunting and gathering on land. I mean if we were all out there hunting deer and buffalo we’d be in pretty bad shape," he said laughing at the notion.

Fish farming and aquaculture, the method of harvesting fish in farms for commercial sale, is quickly taking over the seafood market and replacing commercial fishermen. Though it has been practiced in Asia for hundreds of year, American aquaculturists have struggled to convince environmentalists, health experts, and the general public that farmed fish is equal in quality and health to wild fish.

Arizona alone is home to more than 30 fish farms that produce an average of 500,000 pounds of fish a year, according to the Arizona Aquaculture Association. Arizonan fish farms produce mainly catfish, tilapia and trout.

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UNFAO) estimates last year nearly 50 percent of fish consumed in the world was farm-raised, with the amount increasing each year.

Certain demographic trends have led to soaring numbers of seafood consumption in the United States in recent years, most importantly numerous studies suggesting the health benefits of fish. Fish are high in protein, low in fat, and full of Omega-3 fatty acids as well as polyunsaturated fatty acids, making them a staple in a diet-crazed society.

In an attempt to maximize the health benefits, consumers have been wary of farmed fish which many believe are inferior to wild fish.

Fitzsimmons explains: "Quality-wise there is very little difference. If anything the farmed fish typically is better quality because you schedule the harvest, you schedule the processing, you can have trucks there with ice, it’s much better. If you go take the fish out of a cage or a pond or a tank and take it right to the processing plant, that’s going to be better than someone who’s going to drag it under water for a couple of hours dead, bring it up on the boat then take it to shore and process it. I mean it’s several days old. You’re calling it fresh and it’s been dead for a long time."

He adds that although farmed fish have been shown to have less Omega-3s than wild fish, it is still the second-highest source. Farmers have improved the feed given to the fish to add more of the fatty acids, but increasing them more would further increase the cost by around 3 percent, an increase farmers try to avoid.

"All fish is healthy," Victor Banda, fishmonger at the 17th Street Market, said while showing off his selection of fish, a good portion of which is imported from fish farms from out of state. Dressed head to toe in a fisherman’s gray rubber gear and bathed in fishy cologne, he explains that even wild fish can contain pollutants depending on which waters they are taken from.

Not all fish sold at the 17th Street Market, or other markets around town, are brought in from the ocean by fishermen. In fact, at Banda’s market there is nearly the same amount of farmed fish as there are wild. You can’t beat the cost of farmed fish, Banda explains.

Rincon Market customers Eugenia Bas-Isaac and her husband Raymond Latchman buy their fish from fishmonger Yuri Rabayev, and don’t mind paying extra to buy fresh caught salmon.

"Farmed fish is yuck," she said while scrunching up her face like a child refusing to take cough medicine. "You can really taste the difference and it’s so much better for you."

However Rabayev believes "farming preserves the wild fish," and there is little difference in taste and quality.

Farming continues to be, in Fitzsimmon’s opinion, the only realistic and financially sustainable way to meet the increasing consumer need. UNFAO also estimates that an additional 40 tons of seafood will be needed by 2030 to meet consumer demand. This has the potential to be terribly detrimental to ocean life if farming is not implemented, Fitzsimmons said.

For Arizonan fish farmers, using the amount of water needed for farming would not be practical. However the idea is to combine two industries – aquaculture and agriculture – to increase profitability. In the desert especially, water is an expensive commodity making fish farming impractical. However, if fish farmers team-up to share water used for crop farming, both can increase profit.

Commercial fishing as an occupation is quickly being replaced by fish farms and fishing is becoming a sport rather than occupation. According to the American Sportsfishing Association, the sport of fishing created 14,729 jobs in Arizona in 2006 and brought $849,711,854 to the state in retail sales. The sport has taken over as a more lucrative business than the occupation.

"If you’re looking purely at the economics," Fitzsimmons said, "the sportsman will pay more to catch fish for entertainment than the commercial boat ever would."

Safe and cost-effective fish farms are replacing commercial fisheries. High costs to insure fishing boats and the fishermen they carry, coupled with high fuel costs and increased real estate on coast-line-producing high dock fees have left fishing companies unable to compete with fish farms.

"I feel bad for the shrimp guy in Louisiana who can’t go out and catch shrimp now in the morning and come back to the dock in New Orleans and sell them cheaper than some guy can go to Ecuador, build a farm, hatch out all the larvae, feed them for four months, process them and fly them to New Orleans," Fitzsimmons said. "If he can put them there cheaper than a fisherman can go out and catch them, then obviously there is something wrong with the economic model of fishing. You feel sad for them."

He added: "I had a grandfather who had a trunk company who sold trunks to cars and then they started building the trunks in the cars so he went out of business. Granted fish farming is no where near as romantic as going out to sea like these guys, but I guess that’s progress."

 

Ashli Woods is a freelance writer.

Previous:
Business helps parents keep up with Trendz
Next:

Comments

story wrote on Apr 6, 2009 1:56 AM:

" Very useful files search engine. megaupload-download.com is a search engine designed to search files in various file sharing and uploading sites. "

Odd Grydeland wrote on May 19, 2008 8:09 PM:

" Having been in the fishfarming (salmon)business for some 23 years, I really appreciate the facts in Ashli Woods'story.
I just have a couple of corrections;
1) Fish farming has been practiced in Asia for THOUSANDS of years- not hundreds.
2) Farmed salmon often contains higher levels of Omega-3 fatty acids than their wild counterparts.

Thank you for an enlightening story- a similar one was published in the Calgary Herald recently. "

Kathryn Dunn wrote on May 6, 2008 5:28 AM:

" Although not a fish eater this article made me think about the differences. With pollution taking over our streams it seems like a reputable fish farm would be the safer choice for your options. Thank you Ms Ashli for helping us decide. "

Rusty wrote on Apr 29, 2008 3:55 PM:

" Wow I never thought about fresh fish not being as fresh as farmed fish. Very informative. What an awesome article. I think i will have some of that Bee-battered fish but will forever think........Is this thing fresh? Thanks Ms. Ashli! "

Kassi Woods wrote on Apr 29, 2008 2:50 PM:

" this is an AMAIZING story! who ever the writer is she is just brilliant;) "

Steve Spaeth wrote on Apr 28, 2008 12:25 PM:

" You failed to mention that fish farms can be cesspools of fecal matter that fester diseases which are decimating wild fish populations. If you are attempting to be informative, be sure to include both sides of the issue. "

David Wright wrote on Apr 28, 2008 6:56 AM:

" What a great story! The information was very useful...besides that...after reading the article I was in the mood for some beer-battered fish. Thanks Ms. Ashli! "

Dell Smith Klein wrote on Apr 28, 2008 6:54 AM:

" Since Arizona has only one natural lake, fish farming is a good alternative for the state. Good job Ms. Woods. "

Lori Gumm wrote on Apr 27, 2008 10:27 PM:

" This is a very informative article. I had no idea there was contraversay over fish farming. Good writing by the writer as well! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 500 words or fewer.

Comments appear immediately on the site. Editors do review comments periodically during the day, and will remove offensive or off-topic content. You may also report inappropriate comments to the editors. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Tucson Twitter

Tucson Twitter

What is Twitter?

Online Dining Page

Flickr

Online Dining Page

Click to Flickr

Flickr

View our Flickr page

Fresh Business Tips

Fresh Business Tips

View Video Feed

Classifieds


Find Real Estate

Real Estate

View All Real Estate

Find a Vehicle

Automotive

View All Automotive