While economy burns, Pima County fiddles with more spending


Published on Friday, September 12, 2008

Hoping the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl will be relisted as an endangered species, Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry is pushing the Board of Supervisors to approve a new Multi Species Conservation Plan for its unadopted Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan.

Using our money, the county has approved at least four other species plans since 2003.

But now there’s a chance a Democratic president’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or a federal court might restore the owl to the endangered list.


ADVERTISEMENT

Huckelberry has been planning this effort since early last year, however, shortly after the newly delisted owl appeared to have no chance of being put back on the list.

Meanwhile, environmental activists and county employees have been searching for a substitute for the pygmy owl.

They knew the Tucson shovel-nosed snake, the Sonoyta mud turtle, the acuna cactus or the Marana piranha are not as cute as the owl, but they hoped one of them could come off the bench to assume the owl’s job of hindering growth and driving building costs higher.

(Actually, there is no Marana piranha. I tossed that in because it rhymes nicely).

A slumping real estate market and a foreclosure crisis are beside the point to the green bureaucrats and activists. They want to increase the amount of government-owned land in Pima County from the 87 percent it is now to at least 90 percent.

Now that four of the five county supervisors have emerged from the primary elections with no opponents, Huckelberry apparently feels it’s safe for them to resume talking about spending more money for more restrictions on owners who want to build on their own land.

As I predicted in a Feb. 5, 2007, column in Inside Tucson Business, spending more tax money for yet another species plan has enabled the incumbents to dodge criticisms and sharp questions about the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan, land purchases and eroding private property rights during their campaigns.

Democratic Supervisor Sharon Bronson faces Republican businessman Barney Brenner for the District 3 seat in a November election rematch of their first encounter in 2000.

But Democrats Ramón Valadez and Richard Elías in Districts 2 and 5, along with Republicans Ann Day and Ray Carroll in Districts 1 and 4, all have clear sailing in the Nov. 4 election.

Even if Bronson were to lose her seat to Brenner, Huckelberry could probably expect Republicans Carroll and Day to join Democrats Valadez and Elías for the needed votes to enact the species plan.

Carroll and Day have generally supported the same Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan issues Brenner has opposed as a private citizen.

Huckelberry and environmentalists hope the board will support a 2009 bond proposal for more than $200 million in open-space bonds so the county can buy more vacant land around Tucson.

They ignore the fact the county has not protected land and archaeological treasures it already owns.

The timetable Huckelberry set last year called for the species plan to be completed by Nov. 1 of this year and for the county to submit a formal application to the federal government for a blanket permit under section 10 of the Endangered Species Act by Dec. 1.

The permit would allow the county to approve developments that might inconvenience or even kill a few animals, birds, snakes and plants if officials could show they had compensated for those losses by preserving similar land nearby.

Without a section 10 permit, federal approval would be required for each proposed project.

The big question will be whether county taxpayers will vote a third time for a large bond proposal to raise their secondary property taxes to provide more money for vacant land.

Sooner or later, Huckelberry and the supervisors will have to hire more employees to patrol and safeguard the county’s vacant land.

The new employees will open up jobs for managers and directors to supervise them, clerks to process their paychecks and personnel records, desks and vehicles for them to use, etc., etc.

Although the new jobs are a great way for winning politicians to reward campaign workers and supporters, they also will add to our tax bills.

Contact Steve Emerine or e-mail comments for publication to editor@azbiz.com. Emerine is a regular Monday guest on the John C. Scott radio talk show, which airs from 6 a.m. to 7 a.m. and from 11 a.m. to noon weekdays on The Voice KVOI 690-AM. This column appears weekly in Inside Tucson Business.

 

 

 

Previous:
Pima County counts ballots about as well as it grows grass
Next:

Comments

Tim Dowling wrote on Sep 16, 2008 10:31 AM:

" The entire Board of Supervisors should be ousted. their runaway spending has only increased the tax burden on property owners. The problem is getting worse, not better. This is what happens when an uneducated public who are granted the right to vote, fail to investigate the issues/candidates and make an informed decision. "

Scott F wrote on Sep 13, 2008 4:50 PM:

" If the economy is really so bad, this is a moot point. We need to put all this aside and just remember that pygmy owl tastes just like chicken and get the BBQ ready to go. "

Steve Emerine wrote on Sep 13, 2008 5:51 AM:

" James and Reb --

You guys have great ideas. I wish you had run for supervisor this year!

I wonder whether Chuck would support or oppose any attempt to classify those moats as navigable rivers. "

Reb wrote on Sep 12, 2008 6:07 PM:

" I have a suggestion to save money. In your article, you state: "Sooner or later, Huckelberry and the supervisors will have to hire more employees to patrol and safeguard the county’s vacant land."

I think the solution is obvious -- Let's dig a moat around each parcel of county land, stock the moat with the ferocious Marana piranha and let nature safeguard it. How's that for saving money AND being green? "

James Mason wrote on Sep 12, 2008 2:06 PM:

" I don't think this has anything to do with being "green". It has to do with the accumulation and retention of power. The County wants developers to give something to the County (ie-money) in order to develop. When the Supes approved a development agreement for a Walmart on Ajo, it included a provision for a 2% sales tax to be paid to the County for "infrastructure improvements" around the development. Ha ha. That money goes right into the general fund. It also included a provision that Walmart would oppsose any incorporation effort and would continue to pay the sales tax even if the area is incorporated. What interest is it of the County if Walmart wants to be in Tucson City limits? Why is PC so interested in Oro Valley's attempt to incorporate state land? Because they don't want to lose control. Day said in a newspaper article its because the County's "regulations" are more strict than Oro Valley's. What does that mean? I think the whole conservation plan and open space has been a brilliant diversion. The enviro's think they're getting something, Supes can pretend they're green, and developers can continue to develop so long as they pay. And, of course, its the taxpayer who pays the bill. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 500 words or fewer.

Comments appear immediately on the site. Editors do review comments periodically during the day, and will remove offensive or off-topic content. You may also report inappropriate comments to the editors. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   
Inside Tucson Business on Facebook

UP & COMERS

Up and Comers Nomination form

Nomination Form

Tucson Twitter

Tucson Twitter

What is Twitter?

Online Dining Page

Flickr

Online Dining Page

Click to Flickr

Flickr

View our Flickr page

Fresh Business Tips

Fresh Business Tips

View Video Feed