Deciding what to do with a parent's investments

By Steve Dinnen, Christian Science Monitor
Published on Saturday, November 15, 2008

Q: My mother, who I take care of, has her assets in an account with a broker I trust. Should I keep it all in there with the Wall Street crisis? It is diversified with stocks, bonds, and mutual funds.

- J.M, via e-mail

A: If your concern is the safety of your mother’s investments in the event the broker joins the roster of troubled financial firms in the news, you need to determine if it’s a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corp. (SIPC), says Susan Moore, a certified financial planner in Watertown, Mass. Her account statements, company literature from her brokerage, or a call to the broker can confirm this.

ADVERTISEMENT
As long as the broker-dealer is a SIPC member, its customers are covered for up to $500,000 in securities, and up to $100,000 in cash claims. Take note this insurance does not protect against the loss of value of your investments due to market declines. (For more information, visit www.sipc.org.)

Some broker-dealers also provide additional protection for their clients through a private insurance company, such as Customer Asset Protection Co., for account balances above $500,000.

On the other hand, if you’re worried your mother’s investments are too risky for her, Moore advises you to discuss these concerns with her broker. If you aren’t satisfied your mother’s portfolio is appropriate to her age, financial circumstances, and risk tolerance, it might be time to get an independent opinion. You can find the name of a fee-only adviser who will act as a fiduciary (place your mother’s interests above his or her own) at the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (www.napfa.org).

Artwork and IRAs should never mix

Q: Is it possible to purchase artwork using a Roth IRA?

- M.M., via e-mail

A: In a word, no. In more words, Paul Burkemper, president of St. Louis-based Burkemper Group, would point you to Internal Revenue Code 408(m)(2); Prop. Reg. 1.408-10, which discusses prohibited investments for IRAs that include collectibles such as antiques, precious gems and metals, rugs, stamps or coins, works of art, and alcoholic beverages.

One reason for this regulation is that the value of these types of investments is  subjective, says Burkemper, and therefore difficult for the IRS to monitor.

Bear in mind that if you invest in a prohibited investment (such as artwork) inside of your IRA, the entire IRA will then be considered distributed as of Jan. 1 of that year. It will then be fully taxable, and if you’re younger than 59½, there’s also a 10 percent penalty.

When to consider a reverse mortgage

Q: I am 78 and have a 30-year, 6⅛ percent interest mortgage with 10 years left on it. My income is from Social Security. I’m thinking of a reverse-interest mortgage. I owe $103,000 and my house is worth $220,000 to $250,000. My concern is that my daughter have something when I leave. Is there a difference in terms and interest in reverse mortgages? Which ones are considered the best?

M.B., Phoenix

A: While the good news is that you have built up substantial equity in your house, says financial planner Debra Neiman, author of “Money Without Matrimony,” that overhanging mortgage most likely will disqualify you for a reverse mortgage.

In order to qualify, you generally must own your home outright, meaning you have paid off any mortgages that use the house as collateral, she says.

If that weren’t the case, Neiman gives this take on reverse mortgages: They’re most appropriate for people over age 62 who are house rich and cash poor. The homeowner taps into the home’s equity and receives periodic payments from the reverse-mortgage lender.

But the reverse mortgage is not paid back. Rather, the loan and interest are repaid when the last surviving borrower sells the home, permanently vacates the property, or dies.

The downside to the reverse mortgage is its up-front expense. Closing costs are generally higher than those of a conventional mortgage. So the economics make it more prudent only for people who plan to be in their homes for a long period of time.

Got a question? Submit it to Steve Dinnen at money@csmonitor.com. Dinnen’s Financial Q&A column now appears the first and third weeks of each month.
Previous:
There are consequences to drawing pension too early
Next:
With election over, consumers may be in the mood to spend

Comments

Greg King wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:35 PM:

" In the situation described by your reader (Reprint below) they could have had their current mortgage paid off and still be able to access approximately another $45,000. (This would be AFTER all the closing costs).

This would have benefited the 78 year old living off their social security check by eliminating their current mortgage payment and adding that dollar amount back to her savings currently! This can be life changing for many of our seniors living close to the edge or wondering how they are going to make their current payments for the basics (food, medicine, energy costs, etc…). "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 500 words or fewer.

Comments appear immediately on the site. Editors do review comments periodically during the day, and will remove offensive or off-topic content. You may also report inappropriate comments to the editors. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Tucson Twitter

Tucson Twitter

What is Twitter?

Online Dining Page

Flickr

Online Dining Page

Click to Flickr

Flickr

View our Flickr page

Fresh Business Tips

Fresh Business Tips

View Video Feed

Classifieds


Find Real Estate

Real Estate

View All Real Estate

Find a Vehicle

Automotive

View All Automotive