Bankruptcy judges should be allowed to revise mortgage terms

By Terry Goddard, special to Inside Tucson Business
Published on Friday, January 30, 2009

The soaring number of people losing their homes remains a major cause of the nation’s recession.

The magnitude of the foreclosure crisis is hard to overstate. Nationally, about 4.6 million people — one in 10 homeowners — are in the foreclosure process or delinquent in their payments. A record number are filing for bankruptcy. Across the nation, foreclosed properties are dragging down housing values and depressing the economy. Statewide, Arizona has one of the country’s highest foreclosure rates.

Voluntary efforts by mortgage servicers to reduce the flood of foreclosures have been woefully ineffective. These efforts have been complicated by the securitizing of mortgages, making negotiated modifications extremely difficult.

ADVERTISEMENT
What’s needed is a way to modify home loans that is fair to both homeowners and mortgage holders. Ideally, these adjustments would be worked out without creating a new bureaucracy and new costs for taxpayers.

Is such a solution possible?

Yes, and it’s easily within reach.

Federal law already allows bankruptcy courts to revise the terms of almost any loan, included mortgages on second homes. But the mortgage on a primary residence — loans at the heart of this economic crisis — cannot be revised under current bankruptcy law. That must change.

Congress should amend the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to permit bankruptcy courts to adjust primary home mortgages. Judges would then have authority to reduce principal to bring it in line with a home’s current market value, reduce the loan’s interest rate, extend the loan’s term, or make any combination of those three changes.

While the American Bankers Association opposes this change, it’s actually a win-win solution:

In bankruptcy court modifications, mortgage holders will receive lower payments. But that’s more money than they will get if the house is foreclosed and sits unsold for months or even years. The principal of the adjusted loan would often be equal to the value of the home — exactly what the mortgage holder would receive in foreclosure.

If we stem the tide of foreclosures in Arizona and across the country, the housing market will stabilize more quickly and help turn around the economy for everyone.

I have joined attorneys general from 21 other states in a letter to the leaders of Congress urging them to pass a pending bill that will amend the bankruptcy law, a move also supported by President-elect Barack Obama. I was pleased to see that Citigroup, one of the nation’s largest lenders, has dropped its longstanding opposition to this change in the law.

This simple amendment offers multiple benefits. It requires no taxpayer funding, creates no new government bureaucracy, lets a bankruptcy judge distinguish between insolvent homeowners and speculators, forces mortgage holders to accept the loan adjustments within a constitutional structure and provides immediate economic relief.

Homeowners won’t get a free ride from bankruptcy courts. Bankruptcy subjects them to stringent, court-supervised budgets for several years.

The new law will also give mortgage holders greater incentive to modify terms with struggling homeowners before they file for bankruptcy. Most consumers will welcome offers that let them avoid bankruptcy while staying in their homes.

By amending the bankruptcy law, Congress can take a large step toward economic recovery. This change is inexpensive and gives responsibility for the problem to the participants, not to taxpayers. No less importantly, it’s the fastest way to halt our current financial free-fall.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard through his office’s website www.azag.gov/ . The Tucson office is in the State Building, 400 W. Congress St., South Building, Suite 315. The phone number is (520) 628-6504.
Previous:
Next:
It’s about time Tucson Water got tough on connection fees and rates

Comments

keith s wrote on Jan 17, 2009 1:17 PM:

" Wish just once a judge would cram-down a loan made by someone like Goddard. Can you imagine the squeal. If Goddard ever financed one of these ill-advised loans, he wouldn't view a cram-down as a "win-win."

Mr. Goddard--if you want housing to "stabilize" you must allow the market to set prices. Prices are way too high. Your solution will only slow the necessary price adjustment. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 500 words or fewer.

Comments appear immediately on the site. Editors do review comments periodically during the day, and will remove offensive or off-topic content. You may also report inappropriate comments to the editors. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Tucson Twitter

Tucson Twitter

What is Twitter?

Online Dining Page

Flickr

Online Dining Page

Click to Flickr

Flickr

View our Flickr page

Fresh Business Tips

Fresh Business Tips

View Video Feed

Classifieds


Find Real Estate

Real Estate

View All Real Estate

Find a Vehicle

Automotive

View All Automotive