Well let’s play that game.
What would happen if someone led the charge to support Rosemont Copper? Someone who did not have a horse in the race.
|
|
There’s also the money — $300 million a year to be spent in Pima County and $500 million statewide, according to the Western Economic Analysis Center.
And then there are the property taxes. The Rosemont Copper Mine would be one of the biggest taxpayers in the county — to the tune of $16 million. That pays for lots of teachers, deputies and ball fields.
What I hear from long-time miners is that this would not be like the open pit mines of old. Instead of a huge scar covering a dozen square miles, this one would be smaller. And let’s be realistic. How many of us have actually hiked in the area? Those who have know it’s already riddled with the remnants of previous mining efforts. Once the Rosemont Mine goes into production, how many of us would even know it? That’s what I figured.
Opponents of the mine are a vocal minority trying to preserve a utopian vision of a pristine planet that doesn’t exist.
Without copper, these same folks would not be able to get their Mac laptops or their Prius cars.
Plain and simple, we need copper. Where do we want to mine for it? In Indonesia, Peru, or the Congo? Foreign counties that may have unstable governments or face chronic stoppages by workers who have to endure poor conditions and pay.
But do radical environmentalists here care? I doubt it.
Putting the kibosh on the Rosemont Mine is the ultimate NIMBY play — orchestrated by a politically correct, tied-in group with a lot of time on their hands.
By not allowing the mine to move forward, copper supply will be diminished while demand is kept high, along with the price.
In fact, stopping the mine would directly result in keeping prices unnecessarily high on things we need that are made with copper. It’s one of the unintended consequences foisted upon us by a radical environmental movement. It reeks with social injustice. Beating back the supply of needed commodities, keeps low income earners poorer. Lost jobs and higher prices are the byproduct of this utopian worldview.
Most wage earners want a job and a chance to provide for their families. They don’t wake up and say to themselves “let’s go hike in the Santa Ritas.” Most don’t really have time to bone up on the environmental cause du jour.
There are tradeoffs to make every day. Do I watch my daughter’s soccer game or go to my son’s clarinet recital?
In people’s heart of hearts — if they really thought long and hard about it — would they realize an impaired quality of life if the Rosemont Mine were opened? I don’t think so.
So would someone really come out and support the mine? Would common sense win out over political correctness?
This region is at a crossroads. We are in an economic recession. We need a stimulus — one that does not rely on a government handout paid by taxpayers.
Would someone who has the ear of the community be tarred and feathered if they came out for the mine? Probably, but it may be what’s needed.
Contact Mike Boyd at azmboyds@aol.com. Boyd is currently vice president of development for Western Wind Energy Corporation. He has worked as a consultant and lobbyist and served on the Pima County Board of Supervisors from 1992-2000, was Pima County Recorder from 1988-1992 and worked for KVOA 4 and KOLD 13 as a news anchor and reporter from 1984-1988.









Comments
Chris J Horquilla wrote on Sep 3, 2009 1:32 PM:
Considering the amount of the taxpayer's money the Pima County Board of Supervisors has wasted fighting this proposed Rosemont copper project since 2005, Levy's offer to sell Rosemont for $4.5 mlllion would have been a bargain. "
Richard H. wrote on Sep 3, 2009 12:30 PM:
Also, "MR GREEN"Ray Carroll indignantly opposes Rosemont probably because he's afraid a new mine near Tucson would tarnish his cronies' planned bedroom real estate developments. "
Claudia wrote on Sep 3, 2009 9:03 AM:
Chris J. Horquilla wrote on Sep 2, 2009 11:29 PM:
Both the Resolution Copper and Rosemont projects have the capacity of pumping massive amounts of capital into our local economies over extended periods of time. They represent the kind of an economic stimulus package that our community not only desperately needs, but desires. And when done in an environmentally responsible manner, it is an economic stimulus package that will not cost the taxpayer a single dime. "
MT wrote on Sep 1, 2009 2:37 PM:
Peggy wrote on Aug 31, 2009 3:17 PM:
Dona LaSchiava wrote on Aug 31, 2009 1:02 PM:
Jorge Diaz wrote on Aug 30, 2009 7:51 PM:
Mike Boyd has a horse in the race, as Mr. Egan pointed out (he's a lobbyist and consultant, which he omitted in his short biop) -- Mr. Boyd started with a lie, and never quite from there. He won't be tarred and feathered, but he should be ashamed he can't be honest. "
Lilly Largo wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:14 PM:
Elizabeth W wrote on Aug 30, 2009 9:08 AM:
Don't forget that Mike Boyd, who has a family interest in hockey, tried to use Pima County voters to help subsidize an ice skating rink in the Northwest. I was in attendance when it happened.
Talk about "trade-offs to make every day"
I hope there is no trouble with me speaking the truth, rather than the opinionated ad hominem attacks on the residents of Pima County. "
attilla the honey wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:48 AM:
C. Cook wrote on Aug 29, 2009 10:45 AM:
YOU ARE SO RIGHT ! ! ! !
Rosemont Mine makes no sense economically or environmentally "
Scott Egan wrote on Aug 28, 2009 3:23 PM:
The people who oppose the destruction of the Santa Rita Mountains are not the "vocal minority" -- which he knows, or would know, if he bothered to attend any of the numerous public meetings where the overwhelming majority of people opposed the mine. And the people of Green Valley, many of whom who have lead the charge against the mine because of their own terrible experieces with mine taliings, are hardly the "radical environmentalists" Mr. Boyd is trying to portray the opponents as.
You should know better Mike -- and perhaps you do. Is Rosemont one of your "clients" now? Or have you provided enough service to them by giving up our precious drinking water for the profits they will take with them to Canada after the mine is closed but the air and water pollution is left to the rest of us to deal with?
Mr. Boyd talks about jobs. What about the effect on tourism this mine will have, along Scenic Highway 83, as the trucks roll out and the local business people close down? And how many jobs will there be if you keep giving away all of our water, Mike?
Rosemont Mine makes no sense economically or environmentally, and you should be ashamed of your role in supporting them at CAWCD, rather than writing this nonsense to try to justify your selling out of our community.
Sincerely,
Scott D. Egan
Executive Assistant to Ray Carroll
(and a fellow Republican who is neither "politically correct" a "radical environmentalist" or someone with a lot of time on my hands!) "