Yes, they demand that a convention hotel be built nearby. So here’s the exciting news: we — you and I — are going into the hotel business. Won’t that be fun?
Fun, maybe, but probably not profitable. And I can tell you with some authority that when your hotel is losing money, a lot of the fun goes out of it. But why would I assume this hotel is going to lose money? Here’s why:
|
|
But the hotel developer the city has been able to interest in this job is one who is willing to work for fees but not put any of its own money into it. In other words, the development company will do its job then go home. It won’t participate in the profits and losses.
It seems obvious that if no one wants to put private capital into the project, the deal cannot be screaming profit. Tucson’s city fathers and mothers have not demonstrated expertise in negotiating for a hotel, a complex undertaking. If city council members couldn’t even get Rio Nuevo downtown redevelopment to flow, what conceivable reason is there to think they can put a hotel deal together?
And whose money will pay for the hotel? Yours and mine. That’s why I said we are going into the hotel business. And the city is going to be our operating partner.
Welcome to the Hotel Bankruptcy. Of course bankruptcy won’t likely be involved because the city need only increase sales taxes to raise more money.
There are a lot of sentimental reasons why everyone wants the AGTA show to remain here. Even the gem show people get a little misty-eyed when they have to talk about their alternatives. But we have to face facts. Tucson is not a convention city. We don’t have the travel connections or the facilities, and private interest in providing any is not apparent.
No government at any level has any business owning or operating a hotel. And we should not be trying to figure out what to do under time pressure. The AGTA has set a deadline and it’s a short one; too short in my opinion to do the job right. We should not try to meet that short deadline. This extremely complex transaction will take too long to do right and meet the deadline, too.
Tucson should abandon any idea it can meet AGTA’s deadline because it can’t. If city council members had any experience with such undertakings they would know that. A more prudent effort would be based on a commitment to attract private investment. The owner and operator of the hotel must have equity in the deal. Otherwise they are just hired help. You would be surprised how attentive and creative people are when they are working with their own money and not that of the taxpayers.
The city should take its time with this project so it has a chance of getting it right.
Grit your teeth, we will probably lose the gem show, at least in the near term. Freed from the pressure to do it really fast, we can entertain the luxury of doing it really right.
That means getting hotel people involved, not just lawyers and bankers and governmental administrators. At the risk of redundancy, I emphasize City Hall should back out of this deal, get hotel people who have money involved, and let them tell us what is feasible.
If we do put up a hotel, we should make it the best darned hotel in Pima County, a modest enough aspiration, not something that will soon look threadbare for being forced to cut corners. If private money refuses to do the deal, that tells us everything we need to know about it.
Contact Lionel Waxman at territorial@waxmanmedia.com or visit his website: www.newflashpoint.com.








Comments
Lee Little wrote on Oct 30, 2009 9:06 AM:
alan wrote on Oct 18, 2009 8:37 PM:
The City is proposing to borrow almost $200 million to build a Convention Center Hotel. Let me show you the $130 million subsidy from the general fund that is needed to build the hotel.
Private investors
The City has been asking private investors for years to consider building a convention center hotel. Private investors have said NO! Their message is that the hotel does not make financial sense. (1)
That doesn’t work – so now what?
Public-owned hotel
If the hotel is owned by the Rio Nuevo, the hotel won’t have to pay property taxes and many other taxes. Plus, Rio Nuevo can borrow money at lower rates than private business because they can issue tax-exempt bonds; this is very helpful because we have to borrow almost $200 million to build the hotel. This should make the hotel profitable…but NO, the hotel would not be able to make the debt service payments of $16 million/year. (2)
That doesn’t work – so now what?
Special site-specific taxes
How can we make the debt service payments? Here’s an idea, let’s impose a bunch of special taxes if you stay at the hotel or hold an event at the convention center. Over the life of the bonds, these taxes will be over $100 million. This money could go to the general fund to help pay for core services. Instead, the money is needed to pay for debt service. You would think that a $100 million subsidy, no property taxes, and lower interest rates would be work… but NO, the debt service coverage is still not sufficient. (3) (4)
That doesn’t work – so now what?
Direct cash subsidy from the City
What if we have the City make a direct cash subsidy of $1.1 million/year for the life of the bonds? This will provide over $30 million. So now we have over $130 million of cash subsidies and you would think we should be able to finance the hotel…but NO! (5)
That doesn’t work – so now what?
City guarantee
What if the City of Tucson (i.e. Taxpayers) guarantees the loan if the hotel turns out to be a bust? This has to work because the city is in such great financial shape that investors should be chomping at the bit to loan $200 million for the hotel. Well guess what…we now learn that investors still are not interested. Apparently, investors are concerned that the City is running a large ‘structural budget deficit’ and their credit rating is falling (6)
That doesn’t work – so now what?
Hoping and praying
Several City officials have stated that the new plan is to: Let’s wait until next spring and hope investors change their mind.
tucsonaz.gov/rionuevo/docs/HotelReport_final_4.17.09.pdf "
Angus Scott-Fleming wrote on Oct 17, 2009 2:48 PM: