The grocers are currently engaged in labor negotiations with the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 99. The current labor contract expired last year, and a recent extension expired on October 31.
The "mutual strike assistance and lockout agreement" allows, but does not require, either Safeway or Fry's to force union members into a strike if members strike at the other employer. The agreement does not preclude either Fry’s or Safeway from independently entering into a settlement with UFCW Local 99.
|
|
Diane Mulligan, a Fry's spokesperson said this accomplishes three things: it levels the playing field as the one union is negotiating with both chains; it removes any undue pressure on one chain to sign a contract that is bad for the grocery industry in Arizona and with both employees off the job at both employers it should create some expediancy to get all parties back to the table.
The main issues in the negotiations revolve around wage increases and employee contributions to health-care premiums. Current employees don't contribute to health-care premiums now, but the employers' offer included contributions from newly hired workers of $5 to $15 per pay period.
The union is set to hit the picket lines Friday at 6 p.m. if no agreement is reached. Fry’s has already hired and is training more than 2,500 temporary workers should the strike move forward.
Fry's has 120 stores in Arizona and employs 17,000 people, 12,000 of which are union members. Safeway employs 10,000 union members in its 116 stores around the state.









Comments
Safeway Worker wrote on Nov 13, 2009 3:25 AM:
Safeway Worker wrote on Nov 13, 2009 2:45 AM:
Safeway Worker wrote on Nov 13, 2009 2:11 AM:
John316 wrote on Nov 12, 2009 11:53 PM:
John316 wrote on Nov 12, 2009 11:42 PM:
fairwagesforall wrote on Nov 12, 2009 7:54 PM:
With a raise in co-pay then people would only pay more for something they use not for something they are not using, this seems the most fair option for both sides. Chances are that they will raise our co-pay again AND hit us with the new premium. The average worker doesn't make much over minimum wages so any increase is really hit in the budget.
Everyone thinks that equal pay for men and women is a good thing and is the law so why not equal for all workers doing the same job? We have two pay levels and they want to add a third! The same people doing the same work will not make the same wages and it will take them TEN YEARS to get to "top pay" which isn't that great.
They had profits of a BILLION DOLLARS last year even with the bad economy because our wages
have been FROZEN for years.
Please support the workers even if you don't believe in Unions.
Thank You! "
J Guest wrote on Nov 12, 2009 3:58 PM:
If you watch a bagger closely you might see actual movement. Like a time-lapse video of a sloth. Consider yourself lucky; it's not often observed in the wild. I'd suggest naming a glacier after them. The ones who don't have an excuse that is. Some are handicapped, and doing their very best. Tremendous admiration for Fry's for not only hiring these folks, but putting them right on the front lines, uh, so to speak. This is a spot where speed is king and Fry's has said tough, they're doing their best, chill out. I couldn't agree more. Way to go Fry's.
Ok, now where were we? Oh yeah, the strike... "
Local wrote on Nov 12, 2009 3:47 PM:
john wrote on Nov 12, 2009 1:40 PM:
tough one wrote on Nov 12, 2009 1:04 PM:
That said, I don't want to see unions go away, I just hope that they are indeed working on behalf of the employees in this matter.
Best of luck to everyone. "
Amelia749 wrote on Nov 12, 2009 11:51 AM:
How did this happen? They have become some independent, malevolent beast that we no longer have control of, even though they supposedly work for us! You quickly learn that politicians are in it for the money and power, and with the unions you can add the thrill of fighting the "company," showing them who's in control; and if it's at the expense of the members, well that's just the way the cookie crumbles. At least we showed them we wouldn't be pushed around. (Comforting thought as we stand in line at DES.)
Try this, see what kind of pay raise the company would be willing to offer in exchange for kicking the union into the gutter where it belongs. Then it becomes a simple equation, they will either offer a compensation package that will attract and retain quality employees - and thereby customers - or they won't. And they will suffer the losses accordingly. Viva la American way!
Last one to the DES office is a past-expiration-date egg! "
Look wrote on Nov 12, 2009 10:40 AM:
small town girl wrote on Nov 12, 2009 10:01 AM:
Amanda E wrote on Nov 12, 2009 9:24 AM:
Robert Rowley wrote on Nov 12, 2009 9:02 AM:
sickboi35 wrote on Nov 12, 2009 8:27 AM:
Amy wrote on Nov 12, 2009 12:12 AM:
Beth W. wrote on Nov 11, 2009 11:34 PM:
Ben wrote on Nov 11, 2009 10:57 PM:
lista wrote on Nov 11, 2009 10:40 PM:
Bewildered wrote on Nov 11, 2009 9:32 PM:
Also the Union must be aware of the fact that many employees are happy with this latest offer. Even so, the Union refuses to let the members vote on whether or not to accept this offer. I wonder what their motives are. Are they that stupid to not know this is the wrong time to strike? Are they clueless about the current economy? They have zero leverage. A lot of employees will leave the Union after this. They (Union leadership) are either complete idiots or absolutely evil. They don't seem to care that they are sending their members to certain doom... "
J Guest wrote on Nov 11, 2009 8:34 PM:
BC wrote on Nov 11, 2009 8:30 PM:
RobertJ wrote on Nov 11, 2009 8:14 PM:
I work for one of the largest employers in southern Arizona. We got no pay raise last year, a pay CUT this year, and are being told we face an even BIGGER pay cut next fiscal year. My wife works for a different employer and ALSO had a paycut this year.
These people need to suck it up or look for something else. What? There IS nothing else? Yeah, that's the whole point. They need to appreciate that they are better off than many right now, and there are no guarantees that even THAT will remain the case. There may be a time for fighting for a better deal, but this is NOT it. "
an employee wrote on Nov 11, 2009 6:49 PM:
They are also NOT telling you that last contract the employees stood down because the companies told us that is what we needed to do in this market to combat our competitors. We accepted what they gave us. We allowed them to create a two-tiered system. Now they want to make it three tiers. They are also NOT telling you they are making money in this economy. Perhaps not as much as they want, but making it nonetheless. They are also NOT telling you they just paid out 1st half bonuses to their managers. But the workers need to be the ones to give to make the company profitable?
I have worked for one of the companies for the last 20 years. I make $12 an hour. I am not complaining. Part of my compensation was always my benefits. I have worked EVERY major holiday for the last 17 years. That was the price to pay and we have all paid it, gladly. We chose the grocery business because not too long ago it was honest work with decent wages and great benefits. Nobody wants a strike. We all want to work! We deserve fair wages and full disclosure on what we are expected to pay out for our insurance.
One last thing to think about.... since the last contract, turnover has been outrageous! We cannot keep employees for the sub-par pay, no benefits for the first year, and scheduling demands of the grocery business. Simply put, these replacement workers would not stay for exactly the reasons we are fighting.
Support the workers! Honor the picket lines should it come to that! "
Joe wrote on Nov 11, 2009 4:55 PM:
chacha wrote on Nov 11, 2009 4:49 PM:
DJG wrote on Nov 11, 2009 3:50 PM:
Breathless wrote on Nov 11, 2009 3:49 PM:
BC wrote on Nov 11, 2009 3:18 PM:
RobertJ wrote on Nov 11, 2009 2:26 PM:
J Guest wrote on Nov 11, 2009 2:20 PM:
heather wrote on Nov 11, 2009 1:40 PM:
GO UNION "
UnionMaid wrote on Nov 11, 2009 11:23 AM: